{"id":3992,"date":"2026-05-05T07:58:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-05T04:58:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.tomanifesto.gr\/?p=3992"},"modified":"2026-05-05T07:58:00","modified_gmt":"2026-05-05T04:58:00","slug":"pasoks-doodling-with-the-independent-authorities","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/en.tomanifesto.gr\/?p=3992","title":{"rendered":"PASOK&#8217;s doodling with the independent authorities"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The background behind the conflict over the independent authorities is not just another parliamentary dispute.<\/p>\n<p>It is an episode that reveals, in an <b>almost blunt way,<\/b> how <b>PASOK<\/b> perceives its institutional role as a <b>tool of tactics<\/b> rather than a guarantor of stability. <\/p>\n<p>The public denunciation by the press spokesperson of the New Democracy party, <b>Alexandra Sdoukou<\/b>, that while there was an agreement on the formation of the Independent Authorities it was then <b>cancelled,<\/b> is not just a political spike. <\/p>\n<p>If it is true &#8211; and as of this writing there has been no convincing rebuttal &#8211; then we are talking about a clear <b>example of political unreliability<\/b>, which erodes not just bipartisan understandings but the very core of the institutional functioning of <b>Parliament.<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Because the Independent Authorities are not a field for petty partisan maneuvering. They are not <b>a lobbying tool<\/b> to serve opportunistic balances. They are institutions that require continuity, consistency and &#8211; above all &#8211; honesty. <\/p>\n<p>When a party appears to agree behind the scenes and backtrack at the forefront, the problem is not political. It is deeply institutional. Even more worrying is the apparent <b>choice of Nikos Androulakis to invest in an opposition line that looks more like a conjunctural coalition than a coherent strategy.<\/b><\/p>\n<p>The alliance with the <b>Liberty League<\/b> and other forces of the so-called &#8220;democratic opposition&#8221; does not follow from a common program or clear principles. It arises from the <b>need for political survival<\/b> in a changing and pressing landscape. <\/p>\n<p>And herein lies the crucial point: when the political line is formed on the basis of <b>which way the wind blows,<\/b>agreements turn into worthless pieces of paper. <b>commitments become expendable<\/b> and institutions become collateral damage. <\/p>\n<p><b>PASOK attempts to present itself as the &#8220;responsible second pole&#8221;. <\/b>But the image it sends out is that of a party that says one thing in closed rooms and another in the public arena. One that signs consensuses and withdraws them when the political costs seem unbearable. That <b>flirts with the rhetoric of denunciation,<\/b> at the same time as it is supposed to defend institutional seriousness.<\/p>\n<p>This attitude not only hurts the credibility of the party itself. <b>It also undermines the possibility of any future understanding. <\/b>For who can trust an interlocutor who appears to change his position from one moment to the next? <\/p>\n<p>And let there be no illusion: the &#8220;democratic opposition&#8221; to which PASOK chooses to attach itself is not a united front of principles. It is a <b>mosaic of reactions, often contradictory, <\/b>that converge on only one point: opposition to the current government. <\/p>\n<p>When this becomes the only glue, <b>politics loses its content<\/b> and becomes a sum of negations. The background, then, is not a detail. It is the essence. <\/p>\n<p>And if the allegations are fully confirmed, then the question will not be whether PASOK made a mistake. It will be <b>whether it can be considered a credible interlocutor on issues that require basic consistency.<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Because in politics you can disagree. You can clash. But <b>you can&#8217;t play with institutions<\/b> as if they were bargaining chips. That&#8217;s where politics ends and the crisis of confidence begins. <\/p>\n<p>At the end of the day, the problem is not a failure or a misjudgment. It is the conscious choice of a party like PASOK to <b>walk in two boats,<\/b> agreeing behind closed doors and then publicly reneging. That is why we are not talking about political tactics but <b>political and institutional cynicism. <\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Nikos Androulakis cannot simultaneously pretend to be the guarantor of seriousness and the willing companion of an opportunistic opposition with the Eleftherias People&#8217;s Party as its ally. <\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>The masks are coming off. <\/b>And behind them is revealed a party that sacrifices its credibility for a few points of political survival. Anyone who instrumentalizes institutions eventually <b>collapses<\/b> with them. And then neither the system nor the correlations are to blame. It&#8217;s the choice. <\/p>\n<p>Nikos Androulakis&#8217; attitude reflects a permanent pendulum between institutional seriousness and tacticalism. PASOK appears to seek a role, but often ends up <b>subverting<\/b> it itself, opting for easy oppositional convergences instead of clear strategy. Thus, instead of establishing credibility, it <b>is trapped in an image of political ambiguity.<\/b><\/p>\n<p>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The background behind the conflict over the independent authorities is not just another parliamentary dispute.<\/p>\n<p>It is an episode that reveals, &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3993,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3992","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.tomanifesto.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3992","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.tomanifesto.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.tomanifesto.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.tomanifesto.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.tomanifesto.gr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3992"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/en.tomanifesto.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3992\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.tomanifesto.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3993"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.tomanifesto.gr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3992"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.tomanifesto.gr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3992"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.tomanifesto.gr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3992"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}