Does one get the false sense that invoking the rule of law is not the communications “mouthpiece” of the opposition opposition;
First and beyond the aspirations of PASOK and the other opposition parties, the constant references to the rule of law by the opposition media shift its character from a legal guarantee to a political weapon. This creates a dynamic where the legal concept is used as a means of political and economic pressure.
The transformation of the rule of law from a guarantor of democratic institutions to a communicative “straw man” for the seizure of power is revealed in the most obvious way by the leaders of the opposition parties, who leave the essence of law on the sidelines in order to attack the prime minister and the government.
Systematically from the side of Nikos Androulakis who resorts to the rhetoric of “delegitimizing” the government from the position of “national prosecutor”.
The obvious became apparent when the PASOK leader, with the moral panic that characterizes the tonal scale of his toxic rhetoric – adopting the model of “opposition through courts” (Juristocracy) on the road paved by the first teacher Zoe Konstantopoulou – criminalizes parliamentary control.
And this not because she cares about the institution, but because she believes that in this way she will find… the one vote.
