Can PASOK invest in the “lost vote” theory and attack Tsipras, Syriza, but is also winking at them for after the elections.
PASOK is playing the “lost vote” in an attempt to retain second place in the next national elections. It appears to be criticising Alexis Tsipras, who is preparing his new party, and SYRIZA, but in essence it is also winking at them for post-election partnerships.
In fact, he now appears to be holding a … butt, changing the narrative somewhat about cooperation with whichever party agrees with Harilaou Trikoupis’ program since, according to his spokesman, “the party that is first largely determines the program. Obviously in consultation with the parties with which it will cooperate. We will check with which other parties we share common priorities.”
So? So what Nikos Androulakis is proclaiming is probably not true, since it is one thing for the other supposedly progressive parties to rush to accept PASOK’s programme and another for there to be… consultations on it, let’s say for example on armament programmes or on the privatisation of the PPC that some people are raising as dominant issues.
And what are the parties with which PASOK shares priorities.Syriza, New Left and if a Tsipras party emerges, why not. And what are these priorities? But to turn the country’s political life into a grand jury. To go after political opponents in the Polakian logic of “put political opponents in jail…”
The funny thing about this is that they themselves say it’s a long way from the primary. That they want time, even as they call for an election … now. Perhaps that alone shows what the situation is in Charilaou Trikoupis, which is seeking a narrative between wiretapping, OPEKEPE and the start of the “hunting” degree season as the tail end of Stefanos Kasselakis and Pavlos Polakis.
The question of why they are attacking the Left parties and Alexis Tsipras if they are the ones they are addressing for cooperation has an answer and it is the word… trunk. Not the sweet, but who will be the… trunk in an impending alliance. Who will be first among those called upon to form the next alliance which will be the “coalition of catharsis.”
The problem, of course, is that they all have no agenda. They have no proposals and alternatives, they cannot support the demand of the citizens which is stability and perspective. On the contrary, they cause negative associations and each party individually and the persons who appear or will appear as leaders.
