Maximos Charakopoulos for Nikos Androulakis: A question of moral order arises – Clear answers must be given

The letter from the 10 executives of the New Republic and the issue that arose with Nikos Androulakis, Maximos Charakopoulos commented on SKAI.

Specifically, he said: “Is it worth commenting on what is presented as a letter from 10 members of the New Democracy party, who are not members of the New Democracy party, but former ones? Among them, there are people who fought and contributed to the fall of the government of Antonis Samaras in 2015, followed Kammenos, formed parties, collaborated with SYRIZA. So, to appear to speak for the soul of the ND they? The people of the New Democracy have the right to talk about the soul of the New Democracy. Those who support it in the easy times, but also in the hard times. The selfless fighters of this party“.

The General Secretary of the Parliamentary Group of New Democracy and MP for Larissa also commented on the case of the one million that PASOK President Nikos Androulakis forgot to declare. Maximos Charakopoulos stressed that a question of moral order arises, correspondingly such brings the opposition party with an accusatory speech.

Specifically, he stressed that “because in the past we have also struggled too much with whether the legal is also moral, I think that clear answers should be given. Caesar’s wife should not only be honored, but also seen. I see new questions this morning, it would be good if these contracts are made public to close any questions. We did not raise the question of legality, we are not the ones to check the legality. There are competent bodies for that. But there is a question of moral order. When some people appear as heralds, as prosecutors, when they attempt to criminalize political life, I think it is good to give answers and close the issue. But I ask in good faith, if this had happened to the Prime Minister of the country, to Kyriakos Mitsotakis, what would have happened? If the Prime Minister had forgotten to declare the one million in his financial affairs, what would have happened? At the very least, they would have called for the Institutions and Transparency Committee“.