The Plenary of the Parliamentwill consider five requests for the waiver of parliamentary immunity of Zoe Konstantopoulou, many of which concerna href=”https://tomanifesto.gr/minysi”>complaints by judicial officials about the Tebon Tebon trial.

The President of the Liberty Alliance is being investigated for acts including unlawful videotaping, invasion of privacy and disruption of a public office.

According to the parliamentary docket, next Tuesday, May 19 the Plenary will be asked to consider five different requests to lift the parliamentary immunity of the President of the Eleftheria Front with an overwhelming majority of dicographies have been formed following suits by judicial officials involved in the trial for the Tempi accident.

As the relevant files show, Ms Konstantopoulou is being investigated for a range of serious, criminal offences including illegal video recording, violation of personal data, violation of the confidentiality of oral conversations, serious disruption of a public service, simple complicity in attempted damage to a public service and slander.

In more detail:

– The first request relates to a case file formed followingcomplaint petitions filed by two judicial officials, for the offences of, on the one hand, violation of the provisions of Article 38 para. 4 of Law No. 4624/2019, on personal data and the article 370A par. 2(b) of the Criminal Code, concerning the violation of the confidentiality of oral conversation and the violation of Article 168 of the Criminal Code, concerning the disruption of the operation of the service, allegedly committed in Larissa on 19 March 2026.

– The second request was submitted for a file formed ex officio and on the occasion of the report of 20-3-2026 before the Prosecutor of the Larissa Court of First Instance, the Head of the Secretariat of the Larissa Court of First Instance. The said petition concerns the criminal acts of violation of article 38 par. 1, 2 and 4 of Law No. 4624/2019, on personal data, the violation of Article 370 A par. 2 lit. a’ of the Criminal Code, concerning the violation of the confidentiality of oral conversation, public disruption and serious disruption of the operation of public service (jointly) and simple complicity in attempted aggravated damage to property that serves for the public benefit, which are alleged to have been committed inside the Larissa Magistrate’s Court on 20 March 2026.

– The third request was submitted following the 8-4-2026 report of an affidavit, which is in the position of a criminal complaint,a police officer of the Larissa Sub-Directorate for the Prosecution and Detection of Crimes,regarding the criminal act of violation of article 38 par. 1, 2, 4 of the law. 4624/2019, on personal data, which is alleged to have been committed against the police officer in question, inside the Larissa Magistrate’s Court, on 20 March 2026. Specifically, Ms Konstantopoulou is alleged to have filmed him and subsequently posted this material on a social networking application on the internet, without his consent.

– The fourth request was submitted for a case filed following the 2/4/, 7/4 and 7/4/2026 sworn reports, which have the status of a complaint, of three police officers, regarding the criminal act of violation of article 38 par. 1 and 2 of Law no. 4624/2019, on personal data, serially, which is alleged to have been committed against them, in Larissa, at the entrance of the building of the complex “GAIOPOLIS” of the University of Thessaly, on 1 April 2026. Specifically, Ms Konstantopoulou is alleged to have videotaped them and subsequently posted this material on a social networking application on the internet, without their consent.

– The last request was submitted following the 16-2-2026 accusation of Adonis Georgiadis, for the criminal act of slander allegedly committed in public, in a serial manner (Article 363a of the Criminal Code) against him, on 2 and 3 February 2026, with statements made by her on the TV shows “KONTRA 24” and “KALIMERA ELLADA”.

It is recalled that the government is ready to submit to Parliament the complaint for the suspension of proceedings in cases involving political figures. The reason for the introduction of the regulation was the OPEKEPE case and the need for immediate answers regarding the actual criminal or non-criminal involvement of MPs.

But given that legislative acts cannot be “photographic” but general with horizontal application they will affect every file concerning a member of Parliament even if he or she is a party leader like Ms Konstantopoulou. This means that if the Parliament gives permission andlifts the immunity, the majority of these cases will probably be heard – even in the first instance – before the elections.